ConquerHSC English Guide

Welcome to a terrifying student experience — the trials and tribulations of studying HSC English. Hopefully, by reading this guide and applying at least one or two techniques, you can jump a few marks up - which can determine what band you will land in! But do not fear because ConquerHSC will help you guide your way through your journey.


FAQ w/ Aax

  • How do I get story ideas?

    You can start with anything you find personally interesting. This could be a location, a person or character sketch, a line of dialogue, an image, a song, a scent etc. Provide your own personal stimulus.

    Note: Your opening line needs to be engaging in order for your intended audience to take an interest in your text. This is known as a hook.

  • What is a thesis?
    The main idea or central message.

    Having a good thesis statement is essential to creating a coherent essay. It is the foundation of your argument, and as such, it must be closely linked to the set question, and it must be sustained throughout the essay.

    Do:

    • Your thesis should be concise, but also answer the question, all parts of the question-

    • Aim for one sentence - no more than two

    • You must introduce an idea that you can repeat readily throughout your essay-STEEL

    • Try to use words from the question in the introduction and conclusion-you can rephrase the phrases throughout the body.

    • It should demonstrate your knowledge of the module and the key idea(s) the question is asking you to discuss

    Do not:

    • Parrot the question back to the marker. You should unpack the question and construct a personal and logical response.

    • Use a thesis statement from a previous assessment - you must respond to the set question.

    • Present a statement that is overly broad as it does not give your discussion a clear focus

    • Do not list all the themes that you intend to explore in your body paragraphs.

    • Use statements with low modality, verbs like “could” “might” lack certainty. Use high modality. Create an assertive and confident voice with “will”, “does”, “shall”, “... is the central focus of the text.”

    • For “to what extent” questions, comment on the way the composer may put forward their argument, using adverbs like “insightfully” and “cleverly” for an evaluation, rather than “to a great extent”, etc.

      RUFTS Steps

      a) Read-slowly read the question twice over

      b) Understand-underline keywords and unpack the question

      c) Filter and reframe the question-Rewrite question in your own words

      d) Think about how you will respond-quick brainstorm-link to themes/module

      e) Solve, check and write -Create your thesis and check links to the question

  • How do I create a thesis?

    Holistically, it should be a one-sentence answer to the question you are given. It should encompass what your essay will be talking about (although do not mention the themes, as that will be the following sentence).

  • How do I remember all my quotes for my exam?

    Need to remember 3845093680934 quotes, and it’s due in two days? There are many ways to help you remember them. The very first thing to do is to cut the irrelevant parts and use what you find necessary.

    For example: [A Room Of One’s Own]

    ❝ Repetition is evident when Woolf says, “Lock up your libraries if you like; but there is no gate, no lock, no bolt that you can set upon the freedom of my mind.” this elucidates the impression... ❞

    This is way too long to write, and it'll be a waste of your time. It is also a waste of space to remember, and you might forget other important information.

    What you should do is: ❝ Repetition is evident when Woolf says there is “no gate, no lock, no bolt” on her freedom, elucidating the impression that . . . ❞

    If you have many quotes, you can do Drawing Associativity. This is where you can draw a simple symbol that represents your quote. A symbol is easier than Word Associativity with flashcards because it is quicker to draw out than writing it down.

    For example: [Brave New World]
    ❝ that is the secret of happiness and virtue — liking what you've got to do.❞

    An associative symbol for this can be a smiley face [e.g. :) ] as the quote mentions “happiness”.


  • What techniques do I use for XXX?

    Don’t be shy and go to our English subject channel(s) and paste the quote in the Discord chat if you cannot find the technique!

  • How do I prepare for the SA section?

You have 45 minutes of writing time for Section I of the examination. So, to make sure you answer all the short-answer questions within this time, practice using this timing guide:

• Complete questions worth 3 marks in 7 minutes

• Complete questions worth 4-5 marks in 10 minutes

• Complete questions worth 6-7 marks in 13 minutes

ANALYSIS FORMAT

S (statement)

T (technique)

E (example)

E (effect)

L (link)

Personally, this is what I use. You might have another acronym; it doesn’t matter - all mean the same thing. Refer to this format as it will be mentioned throughout. Always read the question before the text. If you read the question first, it will be sitting at the back of your mind so that you read the text with purpose. The new style questions are precise and require you to engage with the texts deeply. Therefore, you should read the question more than once before writing your response. You should also be familiar with the Texts and Human Experiences Course Descriptor as examiners formulate questions using this descriptor. For instance, questions may ask you to explore the paradoxes in the human experience. Or, you might be asked how a text represents specific human qualities or emotions associated with a particular experience. A question may require you to examine how the author presents a human experience in ways that ignite new ideas.

Once you have identified the critical aspect of texts and human experiences in a question, begin reading the unseen text using this aspect to interpret the text. When you read with the question in mind, it is called active reading. As you are reading a text, make sure you also pay attention to its textual form. Many short-answer questions require you to explain, analyse, or compare how a writer has represented human experiences in their text. This means that your response needs to focus on the devices a writer has used to influence our understanding of human experiences.

Evidence and Techniques:
Each question will ask you to provide textual evidence and analysis to support your answer. The more marks awarded for a question is usually an indication of how many pieces of evidence and techniques and required. There are no specific guidelines on this as the marks are awarded holistically, but naturally, more evidence and analysis will allow for more marks.

If you have difficulty identifying language techniques, try to spot any easy ones as you read written texts. Alliteration, onomatopoeia, similes, metaphors, symbols and rhetorical questions are generally relatively easy to find. Then try to find a way to link them to the human experience identified in the question. Again, it is helpful to do this in Reading Time. If in doubt about techniques, remember devices like imagery, emotive language, and sensory language are valid! Plan out the amount of time you should spend on each question BEFORE going into the examination. This should ensure you allow enough time for each question.


Capture.PNG

Text Types

Kenneth’s #1 & #2 rules for text analysis!

In this section, we will be exploring a proven, effective systematic way to perform text analysis. This is by no means the most time-efficient way to tackle text analysis, but we have found this to yield high-quality results.

Ultimate Rule #1: Achieve before exploring

If time permits, you should completely avoid reading existing text-analysis documents from past students, textbooks, teachers, etc., before you have done the COMPLETE text-analysis process yourself. Why? Originality is essential as it is valued very highly in HSC English. HSC Markers and your teachers are tired of seeing the same analysis for the text they have seen a thousand times. So, if you just write about what fellow students and teachers have provided you, thinking that you don’t need to analyse the text yourself, then you are already on the back foot.

Ultimate Rule #2: See, evaluate and copy!

ETHICAL DISCLAIMER: Yes, this is NOT ethical because you are NOT referencing the person you obtained the analysis from. So, if you are worried or disturbed about this, please disregard Golden Rule #2.

I have to admit, with all honesty, I actually did not view and copy other people’s text analysis as I was confident in the strength and originality of my analysis. Sorry if this came across to be braggy as it was not meant to be, I promise.

The ‘see’ part allows you to look at existing analysis for the text you need to analyse. These current analysis documents may be obtained via different channels such as Google weblinks, classroom teaching from your teacher, teachers’ handouts/resources, books, etc. Please do NOT copy your peers’ text analysis. If they allow you to see their text analysis, that’s fine. However, it’s generally not ethical or recommended to copy your peer’s text analysis as there could be plagiarism concerns. The ‘evaluate’ part is for you to think if the text analysis that you obtained from some external channel is a piece that is more robust and more original than the text analysis points that you already have. If so, save it somewhere where you can retrieve and use it later! Finally, the ‘copy’ part will be the application of the text analysis piece. Maybe the text analysis piece you obtained from some external source already exists in a paragraph form that you can simply copy & paste straight into an essay’s body. However, most of the case, you will be required to add in some sentences to link back the key analysis piece to match the core idea of the paragraph. However, at this point, the main work has already been done as you have found an excellent text analysis piece gifted to you by someone!

Discursive Tips w/ Aax

I put this extra section in since we’ve gathered that many, many, many students get confused on discursive. And we don’t blame you. We’ve known persuasive since primary school, and we all know what creative is by the time we’ve been sitting on the floor in kindergarten class drawing up a story. Discursive isn’t scary. It’s fun - and if you get good at it, you can even incorporate some fiction in there, as if it was a creative piece.

NESA: “Discursive texts are those whose primary focus is to explore an idea or variety of topics. These texts involve the discussion of an idea(s) or opinion(s) without the direct intention of persuading the reader, listener or viewer to adopt any single point of view. Discursive texts can be humorous or serious in tone and can have a formal or informal register. These texts include texts such as feature articles, creative nonfiction, blogs, personal essays, documentaries and speeches.”

What can this mean?

It is helpful to see discursive writing as a blend of personal opinion, argument, and imaginative writing around an idea. It is a text that uses anecdotes, rhetorical devices/structure and factual evidence to engage us on both an intellectual and emotional level. Your intention in discursive writing is not necessarily to persuade; instead, you are trying to explore, trying to give a sense of the reason for your own personal perspective, trying to show how you came to an understanding about something.

The word ‘discursive’ evolves from the term ‘discourse’. Discourse is the conversation that sits around any specific topic that might be social, cultural, political, historical etc.; a discursive piece of writing may present a range of views on a particular idea. The syllabus states that it can be formal or informal, ad humorous; however, one must keep in mind the audience and purpose of the piece of writing. The work can include rhetorical devices as in a speech, linguistic devices such as figurative language – similes, metaphors etc., anecdotes and analogies to illustrate the personal, emotional and inclusive nature of ideas and humour- satirical writing parody etc.

Is it possible to be light and humorous in your tone or formal and serious?

It is important that you still actually have a point to convey in discursive writing. One of the traps, when a student attempts a discursive essay, is that their work can become more rambling than insightful. You should have an insight into your subject, and your writing should justify why you have this perspective. You may examine divergent perspectives to help support your discussion, or you may look to opinion or insight from texts to support what you are trying to say.

Research may also assist you in expanding on your points. Again, when referring to research in discursive writing, the emphasis is on what this research helped you realise. It is also important to still have a structure to your work. Discursive writing starts with a clear introduction to the subject (even if it is whimsical and personal), has clear paragraphing and development of discussion and finishes with a conclusion reflecting on the writer’s response to the subject.

Some tips:

  • Explore the topic you are given by offering a personal perspective

  • Balance your unique insight with the perspectives of others

  • Use figurative language to convey your position effectively

  • Write in the first person

  • Conversational/thoughtful tone; low modality language (e.g. ‘It’s worth considering’, ‘perhaps’, ‘we should consider’).

  • Include a title for your discursive response

Good luck.

— Aax